1. Identity statement | |
Reference Type | Journal Article |
Site | mtc-m21c.sid.inpe.br |
Holder Code | isadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S |
Identifier | 8JMKD3MGP3W34R/427NHRP |
Repository | sid.inpe.br/mtc-m21c/2020/03.25.12.17 (restricted access) |
Last Update | 2020:03.25.12.17.09 (UTC) simone |
Metadata Repository | sid.inpe.br/mtc-m21c/2020/03.25.12.17.09 |
Metadata Last Update | 2022:01.04.01.35.02 (UTC) administrator |
DOI | 10.3390/jmse8020137 |
ISSN | 2077-1312 |
Citation Key | ReyMSMTFRAQ:2020:CaStPr |
Title | Assessing different flood risk and damage approaches: a case of study in progreso, Yucatan, Mexico |
Year | 2020 |
Month | Feb. |
Access Date | 2024, Apr. 20 |
Type of Work | journal article |
Secondary Type | PRE PI |
Number of Files | 1 |
Size | 6617 KiB |
|
2. Context | |
Author | 1 Rey, Wilmer 2 Martínez-Amador, Miranda 3 Salles, Paulo 4 Mendoza, E. Tonatiuh 5 Trejo-Rangel, Miguel Angel 6 Franklin, Gemma L. 7 Ruiz-Salcines, Pablo 8 Appendini, Christian M. 9 Quintero-Ibáñez, Julián |
ORCID | 1 0000-0002-2983-5103 2 3 0000-0001-9072-8289 4 0000-0003-4416-4253 5 6 7 0000-0002-3075-9873 8 0000-0002-6044-3351 |
Group | 1 2 3 4 5 CST-CST-SESPG-INPE-MCTIC-GOV-BR |
Affiliation | 1 Centro de Investigaciones Oceanograficas e Hidrograficas del Caribe (CIOH) 2 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) 3 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) 4 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) 5 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) 6 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) 7 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) 8 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) 9 Centro de Investigaciones Oceanograficas e Hidrograficas del Caribe (CIOH) |
Author e-Mail Address | 1 w.reysanchez@gmail.com 2 3 psallesa@iingen.unam.mx 4 emendozap@iingen.unam.mx 5 miguel.rangel@inpe.br 6 GFranklin@iingen.unam.mx 7 pruizs@iingen.unam.mx 8 cappendinia@iingen.unam.mx 9 Jquinteroi@dimar.mil.co |
Journal | Journal of Marine Science and Engineering |
Volume | 8 |
Number | 2 |
Pages | e137 |
History (UTC) | 2020-03-25 12:18:03 :: simone -> administrator :: 2020 2022-01-04 01:35:02 :: administrator -> simone :: 2020 |
|
3. Content and structure | |
Is the master or a copy? | is the master |
Content Stage | completed |
Transferable | 1 |
Content Type | External Contribution |
Version Type | publisher |
Keywords | flood hazard flood vulnerability hydrodynamic modeling CENAPRED Yucatan State |
Abstract | This study applies three different methods to assess the flood risk and damage from the strongest high-pressure cold front (locally known as 'Norte') event in terms of the residual tide from 30 years (1979-2008) of data for Progreso, Yucatan. The most important difference between the three methods is the estimation of flood vulnerability for Progreso. The first method, proposed by Mexico's National Center for the Prevention of Disasters (CENAPRED) and used by the Mexican government is based mostly on economic asset (household goods) values and flood impacts. The second (CENAPREDv2) and third (FRI) methods are proposals for assessing risk that include 17 socioeconomic indicators. The former includes economic asset values, as is the case for CENAPRED, while the latter does not. The main results of this study show that the modeled 'Norte' event flooded 25% of Progreso's city blocks, with an estimated economic flood risk of $USD 16,266 (CENAPRED) and $USD 223,779 (CENAPREDv2), and flood damage of $USD 48,848 and $USD 671,918, respectively. When calculating flood risk (FRI) and flood damage (FRI_FD) without monetary terms, the risk categories along the back-barrier behind Progreso varied spatially from 'very low' to 'high', while areas along the coastal side presented a 'low' and 'very low' risk. These categories increased for the flood damage because the exceedance probability of the flood was not considered as it was for flood risk in the three methodologies. Therefore, flood damage provides the losses caused by a given flood event without considering how probable that loss may be. In conclusion, this study proposes that the selection of the applied method depends on the main objectives and specific interests when assessing flood risk. For instance, if economic damage is the main concern, then the CENAPRED method should be used as it identifies where the larger economic impacts could occur; when a socioeconomic approach is needed then the FRI should be applied, but if both economic damage and socioeconomic aspects are needed, the CENAPREDv2 is recommended. Besides considering economic aspects, the FRI method also includes social variables that can help to map the most vulnerable population in terms of mobility, education, communication access and others. Therefore, the proposed FRI method is very relevant for disaster risk managers and other stakeholders interested in disaster risk reduction. |
Area | CST |
Arrangement | urlib.net > BDMCI > Fonds > Produção pgr ATUAIS > CST > Assessing different flood... |
doc Directory Content | access |
source Directory Content | there are no files |
agreement Directory Content | |
|
4. Conditions of access and use | |
Language | en |
Target File | rey_assessing.pdf |
User Group | simone |
Reader Group | administrator simone |
Visibility | shown |
Read Permission | deny from all and allow from 150.163 |
Update Permission | not transferred |
|
5. Allied materials | |
Next Higher Units | 8JMKD3MGPCW/449U4PL |
Citing Item List | sid.inpe.br/bibdigital/2021/03.06.05.18 3 |
Dissemination | WEBSCI; PORTALCAPES; SCOPUS. |
Host Collection | urlib.net/www/2017/11.22.19.04 |
|
6. Notes | |
Empty Fields | alternatejournal archivingpolicy archivist callnumber copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel e-mailaddress format isbn label lineage mark mirrorrepository nextedition notes parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project resumeid rightsholder schedulinginformation secondarydate secondarykey secondarymark session shorttitle sponsor subject tertiarymark tertiarytype url |
|
7. Description control | |
e-Mail (login) | simone |
update | |
|